MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387236975 · doi:10.2172/2006942

Workflows Community Summit 2022: A Roadmap Revolution

2023· report· en· W4387236975 on OpenAlexaff
Rafael Ferreira da Silva, Rosa M. Badía, Venkat Bala, Deborah Bard, Peer‐Timo Bremer, Ian K. Buckley, Silvina Caíno‐Lores, Kyle Chard, Carole Goble, Shantenu Jha, Daniel S. Katz, Daniel Laney, Manish Parashar, Frédéric Suter, Nick Tyler, Thomas Uram, İlkay Altıntaş, Stefan Andersson, William Arndt, Juan Pedro Aznar, Jonathan Bader, Bartosz Baliś, Christopher J. Blanton, Kelly Rosa Braghetto, Aharon Brodutch, Paul Brunk, Henri Casanova, Alba Cervera Lierta, Justin Chigu, Tainã Coleman, Nick Collier, Iacopo Colonnelli, Frederik Coppens, Michael R. Crusoe, W. S. Cunningham, Bruno Kinoshita, Paolo Di Tomasso, Charles Doutriaux, Matthew T. Downton, Wael Elwasif, Bjoern Enders, Christopher Erdmann, Thomas Fahringer, Ludmilla Figueiredo, Rosa Filgueira, Martin Foltín, Anne Fouilloux, Luiz Gadelha, Andy Gallo, Artur Garcia, Daniel Garijo, Roman G. Gerlach, Ryan E. Grant, Samuel Grayson, Patricia Grubel, Johan E. Gustafsson, Valerie Hayot, Óscar Hernández, Marcus Hilbrich, Annmary Justine, I. Laflotte, Fabian Lehmann, André Luckow, Jakob Luettgau, Ketan Maheshwari, Motohiko Matsuda, Doriana Medić, Peter Mendygral, Marek T. Michalewicz, Jorji Nonaka, Maciej Pawlik, Loïc Pottier, Line Pouchard, Mathias Pütz, Santosh Kumar Radha, Lavanya Ramakrishnan, Sasko Ristov, Paul Romano, Daniel Rosendo, Martin Ruefenacht, Katarzyna Rycerz, Nishant Saurabh, V. Savchenko, Martin Schulz, Christine M. Simpson, Raül Sirvent, Tyler J. Skluzacek, Stian Soiland- Reyes, Renan Santos Souza, Sreenivas R. Sukumar, Ziheng Sun, Alan Sussman, Douglas Thain, Mikhail Titov, Benjamín Tovar, Aalap Tripathy, Matteo Turilli, Bartosz Tużnik, Hubertus J. J. van Dam, Aurelio Vivas, Logan Ward, Patrick Widener, Sean R. Wilkinson, Justyna Zawalska, Mahnoor Zulfiqar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Computing and Data Management
Canadian institutionsAgnostiq (Canada)
FundersOak Ridge National LaboratoryNational Nuclear Security AdministrationOffice of ScienceU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsSummitWorkflowPolitical scienceGeographyComputer scienceCartographyDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Workflows Community Summit was

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0120.007
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1270.080

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.569
GPT teacher head0.494
Teacher spread0.075 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicScientific Computing and Data ManagementFrench-language works237,207