Inheritance of Fusarium wilt resistance in flax
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fusarium wilt (FW) caused by the facultative fungal saprophyte Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lini (Fol) is a major disease affecting flax production. Cultivation of FW-resistant cultivars mitigates effects of the disease and is a requirement for variety registration. Understanding the genetic inheritance of FW resistance will facilitate the development of resistant varieties. In this study, the inheritance of wilt resistance against western Canadian isolates was studied in F8 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) of a cross between cultivars Aurore (moderately resistant) and Oliver (susceptible). Seventeen Fol isolates were collected from across western Canada and tested for differences in the severity of FW on both parental lines and two check lines under controlled environment conditions. Three of the 17 isolates that caused moderate disease severity were selected to screen the RIL population. The segregation of the RILs for FW resistance was determined under controlled conditions and in field wilt nurseries. A 3:1 ratio of susceptible to resistant RILs was observed with two F. oxysporum f. sp. lini isolates, indicating FW resistance was conditioned by two independent recessive genes. Cluster analysis of disease severity data identified two major clusters of phenotypes in the RIL population, in accordance with the 3S:1 R ratio. High heritability of FW resistance was observed at the late flowering stage, indicating a high level of genotypic variation contributing to phenotypic variation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".