MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387266049 · doi:10.1007/s12237-023-01280-0

Shorebird Abundance is Associated with Nutritional Quality of Intertidal Biofilm on the Fraser River Estuary

2023· article· en· W4387266049 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mark C. Drever, Matthew J. Mogle, Tristan J. Douglas, Scott A. Flemming, Diana J. Hamilton, Justin D. Liefer, Robert W. Elner

Bibliographic record

VenueEstuaries and Coasts · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIsotope Analysis in Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaMount Allison UniversityEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
KeywordsCalidrisIntertidal zoneEstuaryBiomass (ecology)EcologyBiologySandpiperHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Dense congregations of shorebirds forage on tidal flats during long-distance migration, and their abundance is presumed to mirror the underlying ecological conditions. We quantified the nutritional content of intertidal biofilm (a thin layer of microalgae, bacteria, and other microorganisms embedded in a mucilaginous matrix that sits on the surface of tidal flats) to assess whether biofilm biomass, macronutrient content (lipid, protein, and carbohydrate), or both, provide a measure of habitat quality for migrating shorebirds. We compared shorebird use, biofilm biomass, macronutrient content, and stable isotope signatures at two mudflats on the Fraser River estuary, British Columbia, Canada, during summer 2020 (southward migration) and spring 2021 (northward migration). The abundances of Western Sandpiper ( Calidris mauri ) and Dunlin ( Calidris alpina ) were consistently higher (6–100×) at Brunswick Point relative to the Iona Foreshore site during both migration periods. Biofilm biomass (chlorophyll a ) was 2× higher at Brunswick Point than Iona Foreshore during southward migration, and was similar between sites during northward migration, suggesting biofilm biomass alone was not a main determinant of shorebird use of these sites. Macronutrient content (lipid, protein, and carbohydrate) in intertidal biofilm was 1.4× to 3.8× higher at Brunswick Point than Iona Foreshore during both migration periods, indicating an association between macronutrient content and shorebird use. Carbohydrate content was higher during southward migration at both tidal flats, whereas protein and lipid content at Iona Foreshore did not show significant differences between years or migration periods. Carbon and nitrogen stable isotope signatures during spring 2021 did not differ between the two sites, suggesting that nutrients had similar relative inputs from marine and freshwater sources. While our comparative study does not eliminate alternative explanations that might act concomitantly (e.g., invertebrate abundance, predation risk, and disturbance), our results are consistent with the hypothesis that small-bodied shorebirds are more abundant at sites where intertidal biofilm has high macronutrient content. The latter can vary in complex ways depending on the taxonomic composition and physiological state of the microphytobenthos. Thus, the nutritional “quality” of intertidal biofilm can serve as a useful measure for determining restoration goals for tidal flats or assessing coastal areas for development projects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEstuaries and CoastsSame topicIsotope Analysis in EcologyFrench-language works237,207