Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article summarizes recent findings regarding the location and setting of the tombof St. Stanislaus in Cracow Cathedral prior to the last quarter of the 14th centurywhen the bishop’s relics were placed in a silver reliquary funded by Elizabeth ofPoland. The martyr’s remains were transferred to the cathedral from the Church atSkałka around 1088, and, over time, a cult developed around them. The exact site ofthe original burial is unknown, but sources suggest it was in the form of an earthengrave. During the efforts for Stanislaus’ canonization in the 1240s, Bishop Prandotaretrieved the relics and displayed them in an unspecified location within the cathedral,this time above the floor. After the canonization, in 1254, contrary to the earlierliterature, the relics were likely placed in a chapel added to the southern aisle for thisparticular purpose; they rested there, presumably in a stone sarcophagus. The chapel underwent thorough reconstruction in the late 1340s, during the construction of the new Gothic cathedral. Most probably it acquired a new dedication to St. Peter and St. Paul at that time. Somewhat earlier, perhaps in 1346, the sarcophagus with the relics was moved to the intersection of the main nave and transept, and about three decades later, it was replaced with a silver reliquary. The emptied sarcophagus was returned to the chapel, where it was still kept in the days of Jan Długosz.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".