Associations of circulating saturated long-chain fatty acids with risk of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: No study has examined the associations between peripheral saturated long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs) and conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's disease (AD). This study aimed to examine whether circulating saturated LCFAs are associated with both risks of incident MCI from cognitively normal (CN) participants and incident AD progressed from MCI in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort. METHODS: We conducted analysis of data from older adults aged 55-90 years who were recruited at 63 sites across the USA and Canada. We examined associations between circulating saturated LCFAs (i.e., C14:0, C16:0, C18:0, C20:0) and risk for incident MCI in CN participants, and incident AD progressed from MCI. FINDINGS: 829 participants who were enrolled in ADNI-1 had data on plasma saturated LCFAs, of which 618 AD-free participants were included in our analysis (226 with normal cognition and 392 with MCI; 60.2% were men). Cox proportional-hazards models were used to account for time-to-event/censor with a 48-month follow-up period for the primary analysis. Other than C20:0, saturated LCFAs were associated with an increased risk for AD among participants with MCI at baseline (Hazard ratios (HRs) = 1.3 to 2.2, P = 0.0005 to 0.003 in fully-adjusted models). No association of C20:0 with risk of AD among participants with MCI was observed. No associations were observed between saturated LCFAs and risk for MCI among participants with normal cognition. INTERPRETATION: Saturated LCFAs are associated with increased risk of progressing from MCI to AD. This finding holds the potential to facilitate precision prevention of AD among patients with MCI. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".