MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387302682 · doi:10.2175/193864718825159181

Digester Gas to Biomethane: Design, Construction, and Operation Lessons Learned

2023· article· en· W4387302682 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Laura Locke, L.H. Ng, Jeff Carmichael

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Water Environment Federation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicOil, Gas, and Environmental Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiogasRenewable natural gasGreenhouse gasNatural gasPayback periodRenewable energyWaste managementMethaneEngineeringEnvironmental scienceFuel gasProduction (economics)Economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Digester Gas to Biomethane: Design, Construction, and Operation Lessons LearnedAbstractThe Lulu Island WWTP Sludge Gas Treatment System upgrades surplus biogas produced from the digesters and delivers pipeline quality biomethane to the natural gas utility as a preference to flaring, to support the Board-established regional greenhouse gas emission reduction goal. The business case for the project is presented, which estimated a 16-year payback. The focus of this discussion is on the challenges faced during the design, construction, and operation of the treatment system, including technology selection, fluctuating surplus biogas flow, and process design and control considerations. Construction of the system was completed in September 2021, and it is currently in operation. This innovative project will contribute to regional environmental objectives, all without subjecting the region’s sewer ratepayers to unreasonable financial risk. The system has been consistently producing greater than 98% methane and is projected to generate 60,000 gigajoules (5.69 x 1010 BTU) of RNG for the natural gas utility each year, enough to supply 600 typical homes.Metro Vancouver desired to upgrade surplus biogas at the Lulu Island WWTP and deliver renewable natural gas to the natural gas utility as a preference to flaring. The focus of this discussion is on the challenges faced during the design, construction, and operation of the biogas treatment system. The business case for the project is also presented. Construction of the system was completed in September 2021, and it has been consistently producing RNG with greater than 98% methane content.SpeakerLocke, LauraPresentation time11:00:0011:20:00Session time10:30:0012:00:00SessionMaking Money from Biogas: RNG to RINsSession locationRoom S501d - Level 5TopicEnergy Production, Conservation, and Management, Intermediate LevelTopicEnergy Production, Conservation, and Management, Intermediate LevelAuthor(s)Locke, LauraAuthor(s)L. Locke 1; L. Ng 2 ; L. Locke 1; K. Kirchen 2; J. Carmichael 2;Author affiliation(s)AECOM 1; Metro Vancouver 2 ; AECOM 1; Metro Vancouver 2; Metro Vancouver 2;SourceProceedings of the Water Environment FederationDocument typeConference PaperPublisherWater Environment FederationPrint publication date Oct 2023DOI10.2175/193864718825159181Volume / Issue Content sourceWEFTECCopyright2023Word count11

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Water Environment FederationSame topicOil, Gas, and Environmental IssuesFrench-language works237,207