Reviewing Nitrification and Ammonia Oxidation in a Complex and Highly Loaded Food and Beverage WRRF
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reviewing Nitrification and Ammonia Oxidation in a Complex and Highly Loaded Food and Beverage WRRFAbstractIn an effort to understand options to improve EBPR stability, research into the sidestream EBPR process configurations has increased. Understanding the carbon generation rate of S2EBPR is key to determining if the process may improve EBPR performance. CWS has investigated methods to describe this apparent fermentation rate and evaluated AFR implications for fullscale performance. The results indicate that differences in measurement methodology can cause the resulting AFR to vary greatly. This paper will provide a case study of the Lone Star Dairy Products wastewater pretreatment plant, including a description of ADI-BVF® technology used to anaerobically digest the raw wastewater, process benefits of low-rate anaerobic digestion of dairy wastewater, upgrades made to the previous pretreatment system, and a review of the operating results in the two years since the pretreatment plant expansion.This study was a retroactive data analysis of a packaged dairy plant water resource recovery facility (WRRF) in southern USA. using ATP and F:M as process indicators of nitrificationSpeakerSchmidt, JordanPresentation time14:30:0015:00:00Session time13:30:0015:00:00SessionFood & Beverage: Upgrades and TroubleshootingSession locationRoom S403a - Level 4TopicFacility Operations and Maintenance, Intermediate Level, Sustainability and Climate Change, Water Reuse and ReclamationTopicFacility Operations and Maintenance, Intermediate Level, Sustainability and Climate Change, Water Reuse and ReclamationAuthor(s)Schmidt, JordanAuthor(s)J. Schmidt <sup>1</sup>; D. Mason <sup>2 </sup>; J. Schmidt <sup>1</sup>; A. Manning <sup>3</sup>;Author affiliation(s)LuminUltra Technologies Ltd., Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada <sup>1</sup>; Veolia Water Technologies & Solutions, United States <sup>2 </sup>; LuminUltra Technologies Ltd. <sup>1</sup>; LuminUltra Technologies Ltd <sup>3</sup>;SourceProceedings of the Water Environment FederationDocument typeConference PaperPublisherWater Environment FederationPrint publication date Oct 2023DOI10.2175/193864718825158992Volume / Issue Content sourceWEFTECCopyright2023Word count16
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".