MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387309557 · doi:10.2175/193864718825159137

Cold, Remote Nutrient Removal: Lessons Learned from First Nations Communities

2023· article· en· W4387309557 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Kelly

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Water Environment Federation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicConstructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainabilityWastewaterDecentralizationNutrientBusinessSewage treatmentEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental economicsEnvironmental planningEnvironmental resource managementEngineeringPolitical scienceEnvironmental engineeringEcologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cold, Remote Nutrient Removal: Lessons Learned from First Nations CommunitiesAbstractThere are multiple challenges that have faced First Nations communities in effectively treating their wastewater, due to severe weather faced in Northern Canadian winters, resource constraints, or difficulties in access to equipment or expertise in maintaining and operating a wastewater treatment plant. This paper discusses how, in spite of these challenges, the use of a submerged attached growth reactor has helped meet nutrient limits in these colder climates while being simple to operate through two case studies based in different remote First Nations communities. This paper will be of interest to all community planners, consulting engineers, wastewater operators and regulators working with remote and/or small to mid-size communities in need of nutrient removal.Remote communities face many challenges in effectively treating wastewater, whether accessing operational expertise or dealing with extreme climates. Many Canadian First Nations have found success meeting nutrient limits in cold climates using their lagoons and post-lagoon nitrification reactors. This presentation discusses two case studies from different First Nations communities, highlighting their respective challenges and solutions.SpeakerKruk, DamianPresentation time16:00:0016:20:00Session time15:30:0017:00:00SessionSmall Community Applications of Decentralization and Associated Management ApproachesSession locationRoom S403a - Level 4TopicIntermediate Level, Research and Innovation, Small Communities and Decentralized Systems, Sustainability and Climate ChangeTopicIntermediate Level, Research and Innovation, Small Communities and Decentralized Systems, Sustainability and Climate ChangeAuthor(s)Kruk, Damian JAuthor(s)D.J. Kruk <sup>1</sup>; P. Kelly <sup>2</sup>;Author affiliation(s)Napier-Reid <sup>1</sup>; Environmental Dynamics International <sup>2 </sup>;SourceProceedings of the Water Environment FederationDocument typeConference PaperPublisherWater Environment FederationPrint publication date Oct 2023DOI10.2175/193864718825159137Volume / Issue Content sourceWEFTECCopyright2023Word count11

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.768

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Water Environment FederationSame topicConstructed Wetlands for Wastewater TreatmentFrench-language works237,207