Pathways to Care for Adolescents Attending a First Hormone Appointment at Canadian Gender Affirming Medical Clinics: A Cross-Sectional Analysis From the Trans Youth CAN! Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Limited research has examined adolescents' pathways to gender-affirming medical care. METHODS: Enrollment in Trans Youth CAN! was at an initial appointment for hormone suppression or gender-affirming hormones, if pubertal or postpubertal, and < 16 years old. Adolescent/parent surveys and clinical records were obtained for 174 adolescents and 160 matched parents at 10 medical clinics across Canada. RESULTS: Participants' mean age was 14.3 years, 95% confidence interval (CI) [14.1-14.6]; 126 (75.8%) identified as boys, 32 (15.9%) girls, and 14 (8.3%) nonbinary. Average wait time after referral was 269 days (95% CI [244, 294]). Adolescents reported 13.5 months seeking gender-affirming medical care, longer than reported by their parents (p = .0001). Family physicians or pediatricians provided 68% of referrals. Prior to clinic, adolescents saw an average of 2.7 (maximum eight) different types of providers (95% CI [2.4, 2.9]). Indigenous background and greater number of types of providers seen were associated with longer time seeking care. The majority of adolescents had ever engaged in self-harm (67.6%), with 58.1% ever seriously considering suicide and 36.0% attempting. Previous self-harm and suicidal thoughts were associated with longer wait times and older age. Seventeen point seven percent of parents/caregivers reported their adolescents had participated in conversion therapy or that parents had considered it. DISCUSSION: The majority of participants were referred by family physicians or pediatricians, seeing multiple types of providers regarding their gender prior to referral. Adolescents experienced significant wait times. Indigenous adolescents reported longer times seeking care. Adolescents with longer wait times were more likely to have ever engaged in self-harm or had suicidal ideation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".