MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Novel Approach for Digital Image Compression in Some Fixed Point Results on Complete G-metric Space Using Comparison Function

2023· article· en· W4387333645 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Analysis and Applications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFixed Point Theorems Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrayscaleMathematicsPixelComputer visionDigital imageComputer scienceImage compressionCompression (physics)Data compressionArtificial intelligenceMetric spaceImage (mathematics)Image processingDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the present time world, digital images are crucial for various applications, that includes the medical industry, aircraft and satellite imaging, underwater imaging and so on. For this huge quantities of digital images are produced and used by these applications. For a variety of reasons, these images also need to be transmitted and stored. Therefore, a technique known as compression is applied to resolve this storage issue while transmitting these images. In this article, by extending some unique fixed point theorem results for comparison function on a complete symmetric G-metric space are used and it is a new approach. Moreover, this paper focuses on a compression method using the new structure of extended G-contraction mapping as it assists in compressing the size of the image. Thus, grayscale images are compressed using extended G-contraction mapping. And thus, grayscale images can be represented as matrices in this structure (pixel values). Also, similar images of reduced size can be obtained using an appropriate matrix G-metric and extended G-contraction mapping. The size of the matrix can be substantially reduced without losing any quality by controlling the order of sub matrices. These images are easy to store and transmit, with little variation between the original and contracted image.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it