MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387344472 · doi:10.7759/cureus.46478

Managing a Patient Presenting With Chest Pain and Gastrointestinal Complaints Using Dupilumab

2023· article· en· W4387344472 on OpenAlexaff
Kayla L Alaimo, Darren N Ramcharan, Oliver G Shaw

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical studies and practices
Canadian institutionsNiagara Health SystemMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDupilumabEmergency departmentNauseaVomitingAbdominal painKetorolacLeukocytosisAdverse effectChest painmyalgiaAnaphylaxisOndansetronAsthmaAnesthesiaPediatricsDermatologyAllergyInternal medicinePsychiatryAnalgesic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adverse drug reactions or adverse drug events account for a significant proportion of emergency department visits among children and adolescents. Unfortunately, rare reactions to medications may go unnoticed by clinicians due to a lack of reporting to drug surveillance and monitoring programs. We present the case of an 18-year-old male who visited the emergency department on two separate occasions after receiving dupilumab injections for his atopic dermatitis. Ten days prior to his presentation, he was evaluated in the emergency room for the onset of chest pain, five days following his first dupilumab injection. Investigations in the interim revealed no cardiac pathology. He presented with a complaint of severe abdominal pain associated with nausea and vomiting several hours after receiving his second dupilumab injection. Investigations for causes of acute gastrointestinal or anaphylactic reactions only revealed mild leukocytosis and hypokalemia. A definitive diagnosis of hypersensitivity reaction, such as anaphylaxis or serum-sickness-like reaction, could not be made at either emergency visit due to the lack of objective findings and few similar reported cases. However, the timing of each event made an adverse reaction highly suspicious as the inciting factor of this patient's symptoms. He received oral potassium, ketorolac, and ondansetron for headache and ongoing nausea respectively. He was discharged home within a few hours after his symptoms had resolved. The limited reports and evidence of these symptoms being associated with dupilumab injections made it difficult to reach a definitive diagnosis. However, a holistic review of the patient's history, medication list, and contextual factors revealed that a rare adverse drug reaction was a possible inciting factor on each separate occasion. Further research is required to determine the frequency and explore the existence of any causal relationship between dupilumab treatment and chest pain or gastritis in adolescent populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicPharmaceutical studies and practicesFrench-language works237,207