MinAres: An Iterative Solver for Symmetric Linear Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We introduce an iterative solver named MINARES for symmetric linear systems $Ax \approx b$, where $A$ is possibly singular. MINARES is based on the symmetric Lanczos process, like MINRES and MINRES-QLP, but it minimizes $\|Ar_k\|$ in each Krylov subspace rather than $\|r_k\|$, where $r_k$ is the current residual vector. When $A$ is symmetric, MINARES minimizes the same quantity $\|Ar_k\|$ as LSMR, but in more relevant Krylov subspaces, and it requires only one matrix-vector product $Av$ per iteration, whereas LSMR would need two. Our numerical experiments with MINRES-QLP and LSMR show that MINARES is a pertinent alternative on consistent symmetric systems and the most suitable Krylov method for inconsistent symmetric systems. We derive properties of MINARES from an equivalent solver named CAR that is to MINARES as CR is to MINRES, is not based on the Lanczos process, and minimizes $\|Ar_k\|$ in the same Krylov subspace as MINARES. We establish that MINARES and CAR generate monotonic $\|x_k - x_{\star}\|$, $\|x_k - x_{\star}\|_A$ and $\|r_k\|$ when $A$ is positive definite.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it