Effect of Cobalt-60 Treatment Dose Rate on Arteriovenous Malformation Obliteration After Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Gamma Knife
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) marginal dose is associated with successful obliteration of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVM). SRS dose rate-how old the cobalt-60 sources are-is known to influence outcomes for some neurological conditions and benign tumors. The objective of this study was to determine the association between cobalt-60 treatment dose rate and cerebral AVM obliteration in patients treated with SRS. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 361 patients undergoing 411 AVM-directed SRS treatments between 2005 and 2019 at a single institution. Lesion characteristics, SRS details, obliteration dates, and post-treatment toxicities were recorded. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses of AVM outcomes regarding SRS dose rate (range 1.3-3.7 Gy, mean = 2.4 Gy, median = 2.5 Gy) were performed. RESULTS: At 10 years post-SRS, 68% of AVMs were obliterated on follow-up imaging. Dose rates >2.9 Gy/min were found to be significantly associated with AVM obliteration compared with those <2.1 Gy/min ( P = .034). AVM size, biologically effective dose, and SRS marginal dose were also associated with obliteration, with obliteration more likely for smaller lesions, higher biologically effective dose, and higher marginal dose. Higher dose rates were not associated with the development of post-SRS radiological or symptomatic edema, although larger AVM volume was associated with both types of edema. CONCLUSION: Patients with cerebral AVMs treated with higher SRS dose rates (from newer cobalt-60 sources) experience higher incidences of obliteration without a significant change in the risk of post-treatment edema.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".