Gemini planet imager 2.0: implementing a Zernike wavefront sensor for non-common path aberrations measurement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
GPI2.0 is an upgrade of the high-contrast instrument known as the Gemini Planet Imager (GPI). This new version is scheduled for installation on Gemini North telescope by the end of 2024. In this document, we outline our approach for addressing Non-Common Path Aberrations (NCPA) measurement and correction within the instrument. Our strategy differs significantly from the methods employed in the original GPI. Our proposal involves the utilization of a dedicated Wavefront Sensor (WFS) positioned within the coronagraph branch to accurately measure NCPAs. Subsequently, we will compensate for these aberrations by transmitting offset signals to the adaptive optics WFS. The chosen dedicated WFS will be a Zernike WFS (ZWFS), known for its exceptional sensitivity. This paper provides insights into the integration plan for incorporating the ZWFS into GPI2.0, details its key characteristics, and outlines the methodology for performing phase inversion based on the ZWFS measurements. Additionally, we present the initial results of experimental tests conducted on the SEAL testbed at the University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".