Improved Linear-Time Streaming Algorithms for Maximizing Monotone Cardinality-Constrained Set Functions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many real-world applications arising from social networks, personalized recommendations, and others, require extracting a relatively small but broadly representative portion of massive data sets. Such problems can often be formulated as maximizing a monotone set function with cardinality constraints. In this paper, we consider a streaming model where elements arrive quickly over time, and create an effective, and low-memory algorithm. First, we provide the first single-pass linear-time algorithm, which is a a deterministic algorithm, achieves an approximation ratio of [Formula: see text] for any [Formula: see text] with a query complexity of [Formula: see text] and a memory complexity of [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is a positive integer and [Formula: see text] is the submodularity ratio. However, the algorithm may produce less-than-ideal results. Our next result is to describe a multi-streaming algorithm, which is the first deterministic algorithm to attain an approximation ratio of [Formula: see text] with linear query complexity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".