MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4387379144 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvad114.1998

SAT526 Limited Utility of Routine Neck Ultrasound Follow-up in Advanced Stage Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

2023· article· en· W4387379144 on OpenAlexaff
Vicki Munro, Syed Hassan Mustafa, Ferhan Siddiqi, Murali Rajaraman, Syed Ali Imran

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStage (stratigraphy)Thyroid cancerThyroglobulinIndeterminateThyroidectomyThyroidCancerInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Disclosure: V. Munro: None. S. Mustafa: None. F.S. Siddiqi: None. M. Rajaraman: None. S.A. Imran: None. Background: Most guidelines recommend periodic cervical ultrasound (US) for ongoing surveillance of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). While recent studies do not support routine US surveillance in low-risk DTC, to date, no study has assessed the clinical utility of cervical US in advanced DTC. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of our hospital DTC registry using the following criteria: a) AJCC stage III and IV, b) minimum follow-up of >4 years since total thyroidectomy +/-I-131 ablation, and c) at least one US per 3 years of follow-up. Patients with hemithyroidectomy only or positive anti-thyroglobulin antibody at the initial visit were excluded. Two years after initial treatment, patients were categorized by Dynamic Risk Stratification (DRS) as excellent, indeterminate, biochemically incomplete, or structurally incomplete response. Data obtained at each visit included: treatment response, thyroglobulin (TG) level, and US findings. Results: A total of 114 patients (85 AJCC stage III and 29 stage IV patients) met the inclusion criteria. Mean age (yrs) at diagnosis was 59, and 67% were female. Mean duration of follow-up was 8.5 years. Based on DRS, 73 patients had excellent response, 28 indeterminate, 8 biochemically incomplete, and 5 structurally incomplete. Recurrence or progression was detected in 20 patients (17.5%): 5 excellent response, 6 indeterminate, 5 biochemically incomplete, and 4 structurally incomplete. Recurrence sites included cervical region (14), distant metastases (5) and both (1). The TG rose from a mean of 4.76 ng/mL at baseline to 40.37 ng/mL at time of recurrence/progression. In those with structurally incomplete disease, US demonstrated progression in all 4 patients. However in other DRS categories, only 5/10 had definite US abnormalities. Of those without recurrence, 4 patients (4.3%) had false positive TG (mean baseline TG 0.08 rose to 11.8 ng/ml) without clinical/radiologic recurrence whereas the rate of false positive US abnormalities was 32% (37/114). The sensitivity and specificity of US vs. TG in diagnosing recurrence was 45% and 60% vs 100% and 95.7%, respectively. Conclusion: Our study suggests that routine cervical US surveillance after initial DRS does not improve the detection of recurrence in patients with excellent, indeterminate, or biochemically incomplete disease, and has a high false positive rate. Therefore, we suggest TG should be considered the mainstay of surveillance and any further imaging guided by DRS status and change in TG. Presentation Date: Saturday, June 17, 2023

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine Society→Same topicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→