THU460 A Case Series Of Hypophosphatasia: Presentation And Response To Asfotase Alfa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Disclosure: F. Alsarraf: None. D.S. Ali: None. K. Almonaei: None. H. Al-Alwani: None. M. Brandi: Consulting Fee; Self; Aboca, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amolyt, Bruno Farmaceutici, Calcilytix, Kyowa Kirin, UCB. Grant Recipient; Self; Abiogen, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amgen Inc, Bruno Farmaceutici, Echolight, Eli Lilly & Company, Kyowa Kirin, SPA, Theramex, UCB. Speaker; Self; Abiogen, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amgen Inc, Bruno Farmaceutici, Calcilytix, Echolight, Eli Lilly & Company, Kyowa Kirin, SPA, Theramex, UCB. A.A. Khan: Advisory Board Member; Self; Amgen Inc, Amolyt, Takeda. Consulting Fee; Self; Amgen Inc. Grant Recipient; Self; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amgen Inc, Ascendis, Chugai, Radius Health, Inc, Takeda, Ultragenyx. Research Investigator; Self; Amgen Inc, Radius Health, Inc. Speaker; Self; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amgen Inc. Introduction: Hypophosphatasia (HPP) is a rare inherited metabolic bone disorder characterized by a deficiency in the tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase (TNSALP) due to loss of function mutation in the ALPL gene. HPP is associated with impaired skeletal mineralization due to elevations in inorganic pyrophosphate and altered phosphate: pyrophosphate ratio. Asfotase alfa (AA) was approved for treatment of HPP in 2015. We present a case series of 7 patients with HPP, 5 with pediatric-onset and 2 with adult-onset, who have been treated with AA and describe the efficacy and safety in these patients. Case presentation: 7 patients (4 females, 3 males) aged 19-68 years with HPP were included in this case series. Diagnosis of HPP was confirmed by DNA analysis. AA was administered in doses of 6mg/kg/week with a mean follow-up of 6 months (SD= 5). Management outcome: Improvement in muscle strength, muscle pain, walking ability and walking distance with a reduction in the use of gait aids was seen. Muscle strength and pain improved by up to 70% from baseline as quantified subjectively by patients. Walking distance improved by up to 100%. Patients also reported improved cognition, mood and energy levels, with up to 90% improvement in mood and 75% improvement in energy levels. 4 out of 6 patients first noted clinical signs of improvement after 3 months of being on therapy. 1 out of the 7 patients sustained a toe fracture 10 months from being on AA. AA was well-tolerated with injection site reactions being the most commonly reported adverse effect. Discussion: HPP treatment with AA in individuals with both pediatric and adult-onset forms resulted in significant improvement in musculoskeletal and cognitive manifestations in addition to patients’ quality of life. It was well tolerated in 6 patients. 1 patient discontinued therapy because of minor adverse effects with myalgias. Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".