Aripiprazole, a Novel Option in the Management of Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) Patients with Augmentation and/or Severe RLS Symptoms: A Report of 4 Cases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) is a sensorimotor disorder associated with an unpleasant urge to move the limbs, relieved with movement, occurring in the evenings and with prolonged rest/inactivity. Treatment with dopamine agonists is effective for up to 60-90% of affected individuals. However, augmentation, ie, the paradoxical worsening of RLS symptoms after prolonged RLS treatment, is frequently reported, typically after 3-10 years of treatment. Here, we present 4 patients with RLS who were successfully treated with dopamine agonists but later developed augmentation. A trial of aripiprazole, a dopamine receptor partial agonist (DRPA), was initiated for treatment of augmentation symptoms. Patients and Methods: Four patients treated for RLS with dopamine agonists developed augmentation. In each instance, augmentation symptoms did not respond adequately to a variety of medications including α2δ drugs, opioids or other agents. A trial of aripiprazole was initiated for each patient, and effects were evaluated. Results: All four patients with severe RLS and augmentation with dopamine agonists achieved symptom control with aripiprazole. Patients endorsed 90-100% efficacy with aripiprazole by subjective self-report after failures with other agents. Further evaluation with the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group RLS Rating Scale (IRLS-SGRS) showed that benefits (from moderate to very severe, to mild to moderate severity) were largely maintained for 1-2 years. Aripiprazole doses to control augmentation symptoms were low (1-4 mg). No significant side effects were reported. Conclusion: Aripiprazole may have utility for augmentation in RLS. We speculate that the partial agonist and antagonist properties of aripiprazole may limit potential for dopamine hyposensitization to progress to cause augmentation. Further research is needed to see if aripiprazole and/or other DRPAs are a viable long-term treatment option for patients experiencing augmentation and/or severe RLS with dopamine agonist therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".