MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387402176 · doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101867

57P Clinical characteristics and outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with tumour and germline BRCA1/2 mutations

2023· article· en· W4387402176 on OpenAlexaff
Gerald Arthur, Sanyuan Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueESMO Open · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencyVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap
KeywordsKRASGermlineLung cancerGenetic testingGermline mutationMedicineOncologyCancerInternal medicineFamily historyMutationCancer researchBiologyGeneGeneticsColorectal cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Expanded use of tumour molecular testing to enable targeted treatment across multiple cancers has increased identification of potential pathogenic germline variants (pPGVs). In NSCLC, BRCA1 and BRCA2 are two potentially targetable pPGVs that are not well described despite BRCA-mutated lung cancer accounting for 1%-14% of cases. This study evaluates the frequency of BRCA1/2-mutated NSCLC identified via tumour sequencing and describes patient and tumour characteristics, family history, clinical course, and germline BRCA mutational status. NSCLC patients who underwent tumour testing between January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2021 were identified. Next generation sequencing was used to screen for 46 tumour gene mutations including BRCA1/2, with subsequent referral for germline testing via gene specific intronic polymerase chain reaction amplification if pPGVs were identified. Of 2784 patients with NSCLC who had tumour sequencing, 44 (1.6%) had pPGVs in BRCA1/2. The majority of patients had metastatic disease at diagnosis (59.1%) and a family history of cancer in a first-degree relative (56.8%), while 34.1% had personal history of a second primary cancer. Frequently co-mutated genes were TP53 (68.2%), KRAS (40.1%), and EGFR (20.5%). Of patients who had confirmatory testing, 60% (12/20) were confirmed germline BRCA1/2 carriers. Patients with stage IV disease at time of diagnosis with germline BRCA1/2 mutation had shortened overall survival (18.7 ± 4.6 months) when compared to the 8 patients with confirmed somatic BRCA1/2 mutation (63.8 ± 21.8 months, p = 0.027). BRCA1/2 tumour mutations were detected with frequency consistent with prior reports and exhibit high likelihood of associated germline mutation. The observed difference in survival of patients with advanced disease harbouring somatic versus germline mutation warrants further study and highlights the importance of confirmatory germline testing as targeted therapies emerge in order to adequately prognosticate and inform families of at-risk status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueESMO OpenSame topicCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207