Effectiveness of Client Centered- ADL Training Program for Improving Upper Extremity Function in Sub-acute Adhesive Capsulitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONTEXT: Adhesive Capsulitis has been described as a self-limiting condition, lasting on an average 2-3 years. It is estimated to affect 2% -5% of the population. Usually affects performance in activities of daily living. AIM: To study the effectiveness of Actual training of ADL’s along with Conventional Occupational Therapy in improving Upper Extremity function in Sub-acute stage of Adhesive capsulitis METHODS AND MATERIALS: 10 Patients between the age 40-60 years of both the genders, with unilateral shoulder pain for more than 3 months and had received only analgesic treatment. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Statistical analysis-Pain on VAS, UEFI, Muscle Power, ROM And COPM outcomes were done by using descriptive and inferential statistics using chi-square test, Mann Whitney U test and Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test and software used in the analysis were SPSS 24.0 version and GraphPad Prism 7.0 version and p<0.05 is considered as level of significance. CONCLUSION: On therapeutic basis in Occupational Therapy, the Conventional Occupational therapy and Actual ADL training both were effective in subacute stage of Adhesive Capsulitis. But, when Client - Centered care perspective considered, then Actual ADL training along with Conventional Occupational therapy is found to be effective than Conventional Occupational therapy alone. Key words: ADL (Activities of Daily Living), COPM (Canadian Occupational Performance Measure), ROM (Range of Motion), UEFI (Upper Extremity Function Index)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.019 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".