Host country cultural profile and the performance of foreign subsidiaries in Latin America
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While cultural distance (CD) is a popular construct in international business (IB), most studies confound the distance and country profile effects. There is an ever-growing debate on measurement issues and distinguishing the effect of doing business in countries with different cultural profiles. While the vast majority of studies focus on the implications of CD, the objective of this study is to investigate how the cultural profile in the host country affects the financial performance of foreign subsidiaries in Latin America. We employ a quantitative approach with panel data, including over 4200 firm-year observations of the same foreign subsidiary firms in the 10 largest economies in Latin America. We measure cultural profile of the host country using the four original dimensions of Hofstede's framework. Then, we estimate the effects on the financial performance of foreign subsidiary firms using the original scale and by splitting the scale (e.g. degree of masculinity vs degree of femininity) to compare the effects of the opposite poles of the cultural dimensions. The findings reveal that certain cultural characteristics in the host country profile (e.g., individualism and femininity) positively impact performance. In contrast, other cultural traits have a negative (masculinity and collectivism) or no significant impact (uncertainty avoidance). Also, the firms can adjust positively to high and low power distance scores in the host country. This study offers novel insights into the implications of national culture for financial performance by showing that the host country's cultural profile significantly impacts foreign subsidiary firms’ performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".