MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387405277 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvad114.1416

THU165 PROPEL, PROPEL 2 And PROPEL OLE Studies Of Infigratinib In Children With Achondroplasia: Design And Status Of 3 Ongoing Trials

2023· article· en· W4387405277 on OpenAlexaff
Ravi Savarirayan, Josep Maria De Bergua, Paul Arundel, Helen McDevitt, Valérie Cormier‐Daire, Vrinda Saraff, Mars Skae, Borja Delgado, Antonio Leiva‐Gea, M. Salcedo, Jean‐Pierre Salles, Marc Nicolino, Massimiliano Rossi, Pekka Kannus, Michael B. Bober, Howard M. Saal, Paul Harmatz, Christine Burren, Toby Candler, Terry Cho, Elena Muslimova, Richard Weng, Daniela Rogoff, Julie Hoover‐Fong, Melita Irving

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Disclosure: R. Savarirayan: Advisory Board Member; Self; Ascendis Pharma, BioMarin, QED Therapeutics, Sanofi. Consulting Fee; Self; BioMarin. Grant Recipient; Self; Ascendis Pharma, BioMarin, QED Therapeutics, Therachon. Research Investigator; Self; Ascendis Pharma, BioMarin, QED Therapeutics, Therachon. J. De Bergua: None. P. Arundel: None. H. McDevitt: None. V. Cormier-Daire: Advisory Board Member; Self; BioMarin. V. Saraff: None. M. Skae: None. B. Delgado: None. A. Leiva-Gea: None. M. Salcedo: None. J. Salles: None. M.P. Nicolino: None. M. Rossi: Advisory Board Member; Self; BioMarin. P. Kannu: Advisory Board Member; Self; Novartis, Ipsen. Grant Recipient; Self; CIHR. M. Bober: Advisory Board Member; Self; Biomarin. Consulting Fee; Self; Ascendis Pharma, BioMarin, Pfizer, QED Therapeutics. Grant Recipient; Self; Ascendis Pharma, BioMarin, Pfizer, QED Therapeutics. Research Investigator; Self; Ascendis Pharma, BioMarin, Pfizer, QED Therapeutics. J. Phillips III: None. H. Saal: Advisory Board Member; Self; Alexion. Grant Recipient; Self; Alexion, BioMarin, Pfizer, QED Therapeutics. Research Investigator; Self; Alexion, BioMarin, Pfizer, QED Therapeutics. P. Harmatz: Consulting Fee; Self; Audentes, Aeglea, Homology, JCR, Denali, Inventiva, Paradigm, Capsida, Chiesi, Avrobio. Grant Recipient; Self; BioMarin, Inventiva. Research Investigator; Self; BioMarin, Shire/Takeda, QED Therapeutics, RegenXbio, Denali, Ascendis, Amicus, Allievex, JCR, Orphazyme, Idorsia, Sangamo. C. Burren: Grant Recipient; Self; Amgen, Pfizer, QED Therapeutics. Research Investigator; Self; Amgen, Pfizer, QED Therapeutics. T. Candler: None. T. Cho: Employee; Self; QED Therapeutics. Stock Owner; Self; QED Therapeutics. E. Muslimova: Employee; Self; QED Therapeutics. Stock Owner; Self; QED Therapeutics. R. Weng: Employee; Self; QED Therapeutics. Stock Owner; Self; QED Therapeutics. D. Rogoff: Employee; Self; QED Therapeutics. Stock Owner; Self; QED Therapeutics. J. Hoover-Fong: Consulting Fee; Self; Pfizer/Therachon, BioMarin, QED Therapeutics, Sanofi, Ascendis Pharma. Grant Recipient; Self; Pfizer/Therachon, BioMarin, Ascendis Pharma. Research Investigator; Self; Pfizer/Therachon, BioMarin, Ascendis Pharma. M. Irving: Advisory Board Member; Self; Ascendis Pharma, BioMarin, QED Therapeutics, Sanofi, Therachon/Pfizer. Speaker; Self; BioMarin, QED Therapeutics. Background: Achondroplasia (ACH), the most common short-limbed skeletal dysplasia, is characterized by defective endochondral ossification resulting from gain-of-function mutations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) gene, a negative regulator of endochondral bone formation. Infigratinib is a selective, orally bioavailable FGFR1-3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor being investigated for the treatment of ACH in the observational and 2 interventional studies, as detailed below. Methods: PROPEL (NCT04035811) is a non-interventional clinical assessment study designed to characterize the natural history of ∼250 children 2.5 to <17 years of age with ACH over a 6−24-month period. Primary objective: collect baseline height velocity measurements in children who may participate in an interventional study with infigratinib. Primary endpoint: annualized growth velocity (AGV). Further objectives: collect other baseline growth measurements; evaluate exploratory biomarker indicators of growth; assess ACH-related medical events reported as medical history, or non-treatment adverse events (AEs), health-related quality of life, body pain, functional abilities and cognitive functions in children with ACH. PROPEL 2 (NCT04265651) is a phase 2, open-label study of infigratinib in children 3−11 years of age with ACH who completed ≥6 months of observation in PROPEL. This study includes dose-escalation (extended dose-finding treatment phase, n≥40), a pharmacokinetics sub-study (n≥18), and a dose-expansion phase (n≈20) to confirm the selected dose and provide evidence of efficacy. Primary endpoints: AEs; change from baseline in AGV; and infigratinib pharmacokinetics. Secondary endpoints: safety/tolerability of infigratinib; changes from baseline in anthropometric parameters. Exploratory outcomes: changes in quality of life (QoL) and other parameters of disease burden. PROPEL OLE (NCT05145010) is a phase 2, open-label extension study in ∼230 children who completed an interventional study with infigratinib and, potentially, in ≤50 infigratinib-naïve children. Primary objectives: safety, tolerability; and efficacy of long-term daily doses of infigratinib. Secondary objectives: changes in other indicators of growth/development, skeletal abnormalities, QoL/disease burden, and cognitive functions. Children may receive infigratinib until they reach final height. Summary: The PROPEL, PROPEL 2, and PROPEL OLE studies are ongoing. Together, they are intended to contribute to the understanding of the natural history of ACH, provide key evidence on the safety and efficacy of oral infigratinib, including QoL and skeletal changes in children with ACH, and inform the design of future studies in this setting. Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchFrench-language works237,207