Effect of Pest Incidence Before timely sowing and timely sowing on Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), also known as Bengal grams or grams, is the second most important legume in Asia, North Africa, and Mexico. More recently, it has also become an important legume crop in the northern United States, Canada, and Australia. It is grown on an average of 13,544,400 hectares worldwide. 8.8 million tons produced. India is the largest producer of chickpeas in the world with a share of at 71.0 and 67.2% of the total area (9th place) 6 million hectares) and production (8.8 million hectares) and (FAOSTAT, 2013) [5]. Several biotic and abiotic constraints limit chickpea production and productivity, and pests are a major constraint for increasing chickpea production and productivity (Sharma 2005 and Yadav et al., 2006. Sharma et al., 2011) [13-14, 19]. Five chickpea genotypes resistant – RVSSG – 63, RVSSG 8102, Pusa Chickpea Manav, CG Lochan Chana, H 12-55 commercial cultivars were sown across four planting dates between October - January at monthly intervals during 2022 - 23 post rainy seasons under field conditions. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design (RBD) with three replications for each genotype, in a plot of six rows 3 m long (with a spacing of 60 cm between the rows and 10 cm between plants with in a row). Data were recorded one meter row length. At Seven days intervals in each planting. The incidence of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) larvae was highest in the crop sown in October (52.47 larvae per meter row length) in RVSSG 8102. lowest in the December sown crop (14.46 larvae per meter row length) in RVSSG 63. In the 2022 – 23 cropping season. The interaction effects were significant. Second Highest number of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) larvae were recorded on CG Lochan chana (44.13 larvae per meter row length), followed by H12-55 (14.52 larvae per meter row length) and RVSSG 63 (8.60 larvae per meter row length). The lowest incidence of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) larvae was recorded in H12-55 (5.52 larvae per meter row length).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".