MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387441925 · doi:10.4236/jbm.2023.1110005

The Prevalence of Human Cytomegalovirus Viremia among HIV-1 Infected Individuals Undergoing Antiretroviral Therapy

2023· article· en· W4387441925 on OpenAlexaff
Farag A. Bleiblo, Souad A. M. Moftah, Madiha W. M. El-Awamie, Samira F. M. Bo Hagar, Asma A. Elamari, Aida M. M. Elakeili, Aseem Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biosciences and Medicines · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman cytomegalovirusViremiaMedicineSubclinical infectionImmunologyVirologyViral loadAntibodyDiseaseCytomegalovirusViral diseaseHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)VirusHerpesviridaeInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

HIV infection is an emerging health issue in Libya, particularly among young adults. Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a prevalent infectious agent that presents with subclinical and fatal diseases in immunosuppressed individuals including HIV-infected individuals. Although the impact of HCMV infection in HIV-positive patients is well documented in several regions, epidemiologic estimates concerning HCMV co-infection among HIV-infected individuals remain limited in Libya. Hence, this cross-sectional study was undertaken to derive data regarding the prevalence of active HCMV viremia among HIV-infected individuals undergoing antiretroviral therapy (ART) from Libya. A total of 90 consented HIV-infected subjects followed by the National Center for Disease Control (NCDC) of Benghazi/Libya were recruited in this study and investigated for HCMV-IgG, HCMV-IgM specific antibodies, detection of HCMV lower matrix phosphoprotein (pp65) antigen, and detection of HCMV-DNA using qPCR to assess the prevalence of HCMV viremia. We determined that 77 (85.56%) of subjects were seropositive for HCMV-IgG antibodies, whereas the seropositivity for HCMV-IgM was 3.33% (3/90 subjects). Our results also revealed that 4.44% (4/90) of participants had viral antigenemia based on the laboratory diagnosis of HCMV-pp65. Regarding the PCR, we were able to detect the DNA of HCMV only in 3/90 subjects (3.33%) suggesting an active viremic condition. The detection of HCMV DNA along with the HCMV-pp65 in HIV-positive individuals highlights the necessity of early diagnosis to manage the progression of the disease. Furthermore, we highly recommend the use of anti-HCMV therapy in viremic individuals in combination with ART to reduce the burden of HCMV complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biosciences and MedicinesSame topicCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus researchFrench-language works237,207