MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387448533 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2023.3321409

Magneto-Optical Detection of Synthetic Malaria Pigment in Photonic Crystal Fiber

2023· article· en· W4387448533 on OpenAlexafffund
Saeed Azad, Ahmad Al Shboul, Christian Lacroix, Ricardo Izquierdo, David Ménard, Martin Olivier, Carlos Guerrero, Bora Ung

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalRegroupement Québécois sur les Matériaux de PointeMcGill University Health CentreÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds de recherche du Québec
KeywordsHemozoinMaterials scienceAlgorithmAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Computer scienceMalariaBiologyChemistryOrganic chemistryPlasmodium falciparum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The necessity to develop new technologies for high-sensitivity malaria diagnosis has sparked a global effort in medical and integrative sciences. Most developing procedures rely on research-grade instruments, sophisticated assays, or on expertise. In this work, we propose an alternative optical methodology using a compact and user-friendly apparatus based on a photonic crystal fiber (PCF). Malaria pigment known as hemozoin is an insoluble reddish brown microcrystalline. These crystallites stand out from other blood components in terms of their exceptional magneto-optical features. Consequently, they can function as spinning entities in suspension in response to the external magnetic field. Here, synthetic hemozoin (SHz) was obtained in a forthright way with a high yield of 75%. In addition, the prepared sample was characterized morphologically and structurally. The PCF’s nanoholes were filled with the aqueous suspension of SHz with various concentrations and transmitted power recorded in response to the magnetic field. We demonstrate a sensor with a detection threshold of 7.2 parasite/<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mu \text{L}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> well below the level of clinical relevance (50–100 parasite/<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mu \text{L}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>) at a very small liquid sample (less than <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0.5 ~\mu \text{L}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>). The results of this investigation may provide new light on potential medicinal and sensor applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.407
Threshold uncertainty score0.782

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors JournalSame topicPhytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogensFrench-language works237,207