MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4387453756 · doi:10.1101/2023.10.04.560954

APOE, Immune Factors, Sex, and Diet Interact to Shape Brain Networks in Mouse Models of Aging

2023· preprint· en· W4387453756 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Steven L. Winter, Ali Mahzarnia, Robert J. Anderson, Zay Yar Han, Jessica T. Tremblay, Jacques Stout, Hae Sol Moon, Daniel Marcellino, David Dunson, Alexandra Badea

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsApolipoprotein EImmune systemBrain agingNeurosciencePsychologyBiologyGerontologyMedicineCognitionInternal medicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alzheimer's disease (AD) presents complex challenges due to its multifactorial nature, poorly understood etiology, and late detection. The mechanisms through which genetic, fixed and modifiable risk factors influence susceptibility to AD are under intense investigation, yet the impact of unique risk factors on brain networks is difficult to disentangle, and their interactions remain unclear. To model multiple risk factors including APOE genotype, age, sex, diet, and immunity we leveraged mice expressing the human APOE and NOS2 genes, conferring a reduced immune response compared to mouse Nos2. Employing graph analyses of brain connectomes derived from accelerated diffusion-weighted MRI, we assessed the global and local impact of risk factors in the absence of AD pathology. Aging and a high-fat diet impacted extensive networks comprising AD-vulnerable regions, including the temporal association cortex, amygdala, and the periaqueductal gray, involved in stress responses. Sex impacted networks including sexually dimorphic regions (thalamus, insula, hypothalamus) and key memory-processing areas (fimbria, septum). APOE genotypes modulated connectivity in memory, sensory, and motor regions, while diet and immunity both impacted the insula and hypothalamus. Notably, these risk factors converged on a circuit comprising 63 of 54,946 total connections (0.11% of the connectome), highlighting shared vulnerability amongst multiple AD risk factors in regions essential for sensory integration, emotional regulation, decision making, motor coordination, memory, homeostasis, and interoception. These network-based biomarkers hold translational value for distinguishing high-risk versus low-risk participants at preclinical AD stages, suggest circuits as potential therapeutic targets, and advance our understanding of network fingerprints associated with AD risk. Significance Statement: Current interventions for Alzheimer's disease (AD) do not provide a cure, and are delivered years after neuropathological onset. Addressing the impact of risk factors on brain networks holds promises for early detection, prevention, and revealing putative therapeutic targets at preclinical stages. We utilized six mouse models to investigate the impact of factors, including APOE genotype, age, sex, immunity, and diet, on brain networks. Large structural connectomes were derived from high resolution compressed sensing diffusion MRI. A highly parallelized graph classification identified subnetworks associated with unique risk factors, revealing their network fingerprints, and a common network composed of 63 connections with shared vulnerability to all risk factors. APOE genotype specific immune signatures support the design of interventions tailored to risk profiles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→