MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387459320 · doi:10.3389/flupu.2023.1219277

Osteonecrosis is associated with APOL1 variants in African Americans with systemic lupus erythematosus

2023· article· en· W4387459320 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kevin Yip, Meredith Akerman, Ruth Fernandez‐Ruiz, Nicole Leung, Huda Algasas, Yingzhi Qian, Jill P. Buyon, Jasmin Divers, Peter Izmirly, H. Michael Belmont, Ashira Blazer

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Lupus · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesSchool of Medicine, New York UniversityNational Institutes of HealthGeorgia Clinical and Translational Science AllianceYork UniversityRheumatology Research Foundation
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineCohortHazard ratioProportional hazards modelMedical recordRheumatologyGenotypeKidney diseaseConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/purpose African Americans (AA) with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at higher risk for both kidney disease and Osteonecrosis (ON). Two Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) risk variants (RV), G1 and G2, have been associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD), hypertension, and microvascular disease in AAs, which are independent risk factors for ON. Accordingly, we investigated the association between carriers of the APOL1 risk variants and the prevalence of ON in AA SLE patients. Methods A cohort of 121 adult participants of self-reported AA ancestry and meeting at least four of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) revised criteria for SLE were recruited from a high volume urban SLE clinical site. PCR/sequencing was used to stratify participants by APOL1 genotype. Medical records, including clinical notes and imaging reports, were retrospectively reviewed for documentation of ON. Association between the number of APOL1 risk variants with time to first ON was tested. Results In our cohort, 18 individuals developed ON; across the APOL1 genotype groups, 2/37 0RV, 11/59 1RV, and 5/15 2RV participants were affected. The mean time to ON was 27 years, 22 years, and 18 years in 0RV, 1RV, and 2RV carriers, respectively. An adjusted Cox regression model showed that carrying the APOL1 risk variants associated with shorter ON free survival with hazard ratios (HR) of 3.1 (95% CI: 1.6–6.2) and 9.6 (95% CI 2.4–37.8) for 1RV and 2RV carriers, respectively. 2RV carriers more often exhibited multiple and bilateral joint sites affected by ON. Disease duration was longer in ON-affected participants at 20.5 years compared to 9.0 years in those unaffected (p < 0.001). In individuals who had received glucocorticoids, median cumulative prednisone equivalent dose was higher in ON-affected participants, though this did not reach statistical significance (18.7 g vs. 9.0 g; p-value = 0.3). Conclusion Our analysis suggests a higher risk of osteonecrosis among African American SLE patients who carry the APOL1 risk variants. In addition, disease duration increased the rate of ON. Given the high frequency of the APOL1 risk variants in African Americans, APOL1 high-risk genotype carriers may represent an ON-vulnerable subgroup within the AA population. Further work is necessary to uncover the mechanism of this association.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in LupusSame topicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207