Еruption from the spiritual rank. To the 80th anniversary of Yu. N. Solonin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is devoted to the issues of the relationship between philosophy and power, the philosopher’s ascent to power. Although sufficient attention has been paid to the problems of state structure in classical philosophical systems since antiquity, and at the end of the 19th century an independent field — the philosophy of politics-was formed, precedents when philosophers took a direct part in the development and implementation of socio-political programs are extremely rare and unsuccessful. The cases of Plato and the Syracuse tyrant Dionysius, the activities of Confucius as a major state official, the French enlighteners and Catherine the Great, D. de Tracy and Napoleon I, M. Heidegger and the Third Reich, etc. this is perfectly demonstrated. Meanwhile, the focus on practice, on the purposeful introduction of ideas into existential and everyday experiences of life, including state-political, is as immanent to philosophy as pure speculation. Yu. N. Solonin is an example of such a practical philosopher, a state builder. Exploring philosophical problems in his philosophical theoretical works, successfully leading the Faculty of Philosophy of St Petersburg State University for almost a quarter of a century, he also took an active part in the political life of both St Petersburg and the whole country. The post of senator in the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, work in various committees and commissions, where they were conceptually articulated and received their strategic expression, which was then fixed in the laws adopted by the parliament, provided an opportunity to influence the development of the state, as well as to clearly verify the fairness or error of their purely intellectual conclusions. Therefore, the experience of combining the individual, concrete-activity and speculative-contemplative aspects of the existence of the producer of philosophical concepts (i. e. a philosopher), as well as how one affects the other, can also be understood within the framework of the general history of the evolution of philosophical thought as such.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".