MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387482544 · doi:10.1515/9780887554186-002

Notes on Sources

2012· book-chapter· en· W4387482544 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Manitoba Press eBooks · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

documentation of the participation and contributions of the founding peoples of Canada during the First World War is, surprisingly, scant.Most of the literature dedicated to the wartime experiences of indians exists within a national perspective permeated by a dominant thematic tradition that P. Whitney Lackenbauer and r.Scott Sheffield label the "Forgotten Warrior" genre. 1 Within this construct, historians and commentators have recently resurrected the exploits of indian servicemen and -women in order to promote an agenda of recognition and commemoration akin to that bestowed upon their white comrades.the goal of these studies, which succumb to an interpretive orthodoxy based on recycled generalizations and anecdotal corroboration, is to ensure that indian veterans receive acknowledgement for their forgotten sacrifice in increasingly reconciliatory and apologetic Canadian political and social environments.Fred gaffen's Forgotten Soldiers (1985), Pegahmagabow: Legendary Warrior, Forgotten Hero (2003) by adrian Hayes, and Janice Summerby's Native Soldiers, Foreign Battlefields (2005) adhere to this paradigm. 2While this remembrance is certainly worthy, and extremely important, it is not representative of the broader transnational issues and Canadian-specific realities and policies surrounding indian participation in the First World War.in the last decade, however, academics have begun to deviate from this motif by engaging in more scholarly appraisals, represented by L. James dempsey's Warriors of the King: Prairie Indians in World War I (1999). 3Similarly, other detailed explorations of regional contributions and community-specific experiences have recently appeared. 4nevertheless, all accounts remain lodged in a national framework permeated by the "Forgotten Warrior" approach.Historians have not moved beyond blinding national affiliations and have completely disregarded the position of the British Colonial and War offices in requesting, and promoting, indian service.this investigation addresses this national component, along with the dominant international themes that directly influenced indian participation, and the policies and administration surrounding their multi-faceted involvement in the great War.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Manitoba Press eBooksSame topicWorld Wars: History, Literature, and ImpactFrench-language works237,207