Unrolled and Pipelined Decoders based on Look-Up Tables for Polar Codes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unrolling a decoding algorithm allows to achieve extremely high throughput at the cost of increased area. Lookup tables (LUTs) can be used to replace functions otherwise implemented as circuits. In this work, we show the impact of replacing blocks of logic by carefully crafted LUTs in unrolled decoders for polar codes. We show that using LUTs to improve key performance metrics (e.g., area, throughput, latency) may turn out more challenging than expected. We present three variants of LUT-based decoders and describe their inner workings as well as circuits in detail. The LUT-based decoders are compared against a regular unrolled decoder, employing fixed-point representations for numbers, with a comparable error-correction performance. A short systematic polar code is used as an illustration. All resulting unrolled decoders are shown to be capable of an information throughput of little under 10 Gbps in a 28 nm FD-SOI technology clocked in the vicinity of 1.4 GHz to 1.5 GHz. The best variant of our LUT-based decoders is shown to reduce the area requirements by 23% compared to the regular unrolled decoder while retaining a comparable error-correction performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".