MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387497378 · doi:10.1136/rapm-2023-esra.380

#36247 Glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue in the management of rebound intracranial hypertension: a case report

2023· article· en· W4387497378 on OpenAlexaff
James S. Khan, Nina D’hondt, Yasmine Hoydonckx, Megha Poddar, Ian Carroll

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlucagon-like peptide-1Internal medicineChemistryMedicineEndocrinologyDiabetes mellitus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted: Not relevant (see information at the bottom of this page) Application for ESRA Abstract Prizes: I don’t wish to apply for the ESRA Prizes Background and Aims Rebound intracranial hypertension (RIH) is a complication in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) following surgical repair of a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dura leak. Patients suffer from debilitating headache in supine position, that is usually temporarily, but could last for years. Typically, acetazolamide offers relief by decreasing CSF production, but patients can be(come) refractory. Recently, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues were proposed to modulating CSF secretion and reducing intracranial pressure. No studies have evaluated their use for RIH treatment. Methods A 46 year-old female patient with 1.5 years history of SIH developed RIH following surgical leak repair in 2017. She failed to maintain a good response of diuretics despite maximal dosage and failed other interventions. Pain score was high (NRS 6/10) and impacted quality of life, sleep and ability to work. In November 2021, she was initiated on Semaglutide 3 mg daily, and gradually increased over course of 3 months to 14 mg daily. Results The patient reported an immediate pain relief after starting Semaglutide, with further improvement as dose was increased. At 3 months, she reported significantly lower pain scores (NRS 1/10), improved sleep, resumption of part-time work and absence of side-effects. She remained on this drug on daily basis and was able to stop diuretics intake. Conclusions In this case, this GLP-1 agonist appeared to improve RIH symptom. Their role in the treatment of RIH should be evaluated in controlled studies to establish safety and efficacy. Consideration should be paid to how symptom improvement correlates (or not) with measurements of CSF pressure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0090.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCerebral Venous Sinus ThrombosisFrench-language works237,207