MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387497608 · doi:10.1136/rapm-2023-esra.222

EP161 Feasibility of postoperative ketamine infusion in general hospital wards without intense monitoring in chronic pain patients: A retrospective cohort study

2023· article· en· W4387497608 on OpenAlexaff
Tural Alekberli, Shiva Khandadashpoor, Ashok Kumar, Zeev Friedman, Naveed Siddiqui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Sedative Agents
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKetamineMedicineAnesthesiaPerioperativeOpioidRetrospective cohort studyNauseaChronic painAdverse effectSurgeryInternal medicinePhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aims Chronic pain is prevalent and poses challenges in perioperative management. Opioid-dependent patients often require higher opioid doses and experience uncontrolled postoperative pain. Ketamine, a non-competitive NMDA-receptor-antagonist, has shown promise in reducing postoperative opioid-consumption and pain intensity. This study aims to evaluate ketamine-infusion safety and side-effects in postoperative wards and its impact on monitoring protocols, as well as its potential to reduce opioid-use in chronic opioid-dependent patients. Methods In this retrospective chart-review we compared: patients who received intraoperative and postoperative ketamine-infusion(Ketamine-Group) and patients who did not(Control-Group). Outcomes included severity of ketamine-related adverse-effects, opioid-related side-effects measured via validated 11 item scale, and length of hospital stay. Results This study included 202patients, ketamine-group(94-patients) and control-group(108-patients). No ketamine-related severe side-effects were observed in any group. Mild to moderate ketamine-related side-effects were reported in both groups, with mild-hallucinations being more frequent in the ketamine-group(p=0.006). Mild Nausea(P =0.052) and urinary-retention(p<0.001) was observed more frequently in ketamine-group. Constipation was observed more frequently in control-group(p=0.033). Ketamine-group had significantly higher median intraoperative opioid- use(p<0.001), and second 24-hour postoperative opioid-use(p=0.033). Median length of hospital stay in the ketamine-group was 174.55-hours compared to 116.66-hours in control-group(p<0.001)(table-1, figure-1). Conclusions This study demonstrated the feasibility of ketamine-infusion for postoperative opioid consumption in patients with chronic pain without 1:1 monitoring in the ICU or step-down units. The use of ketamine was not associated with any major adverse effects requiring intense resource utilization. There was no direct association between ketamine-related side-effect and increased length of hospital stay. However, the long-term effects of ketamine-infusion on postoperative pain remain to be evaluated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnesthesia and Sedative AgentsFrench-language works237,207