MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387540191 · doi:10.4324/9781003368519-22

Hard Hit by Halal Meat Cartel Controversy

2023· book-chapter· en· W4387540191 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nor Aida Abdul Rahman, Mohd Amri Abdullah, Azizul Hassan, Kamran Mahroof

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHalal products and consumer behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCartelBusinessCommerceIndustrial organizationCollusion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter highlight issues on fake halal meat cartel scandal which was first revealed to the public when a local Malaysian newspaper reported that the meat cartel had been smuggling non-halal meat from countries such as China, Brazil, Canada, and Ukraine. In this chapter, by using abductive research approach, this research aims to cover the issue with the help of current technology such as Internet of Things (IOT) and blockchain technology (BCT). At the same time, risk management activities and effort to promote halal food fraud awareness is also vital for halal business sustainability. The relationship across the channel member is also essential. This chapter aims to focus on technological application such as BCT and IOT to enhance value chain transparency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.549
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHalal products and consumer behaviorFrench-language works237,207