Compressive strength optimization and life cycle assessment of geopolymer concrete using machine learning techniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete is studied in this research work for its compressive strength, life cycle and environmental impact assessment contribution to the construction environment. This is in line with the United Nations’ sustainable development goals SDG9 and SDG11. However, the focus of this research paper is on the sustainability of geopolymer concrete and its overall environmental impact. The metaheuristic machine learning approaches have been deployed to predict the compressive strength (CS) of the GPC based on environmental impact considerations of the concrete constituent materials, which included fly ash, sodium silicate, sodium hydroxide, fine and coarse aggregates. The metaheuristic techniques include the k-Nearest Neighbour (kNN), support vector regression (SVR), and random forest regression (RFR), where all are optimized with the particle swarm (PSO). These metaheuristic techniques have been modified for this research work with new codes to enhance innovation in terms of run time and efficiency. The results of the life cycle assessment (LCA) evaluation of the GPC mixes based on the Ecoinvent 3 available in SimaPro and Eco-indicator 99 and CML 2001 modified in the framework of ReCiPe 2016 recent development show reduced potential of environmental acidification due to increased fly ash (FA) in the GPC mixes compared to previous results. The decisive CS and LCA predictive models, RFR-PSO and SVR-PSO respectively performed optimally above 90% and better than previous models from the literature. Overall, they present an innovative metaheuristic smart technology for the prediction of the GPC infrastructure behavior and performance integrity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".