Bibliographic record
Abstract
Survivors of the Assiniboia Indian Residential School have shared powerful remembrances at our reunions and meetings and through the compilation of our stories in this commemorative book.It is important to understand the meaning of the word "story."In English, a story must be clarified as to whether it's fictional or non-fictional.There isn't that distinction in the Anishinaabe language.You speak as if you were holding an eagle feather or had your hand on the Bible.Your word is your word and your story is truth.I would like to acknowledge and attribute this teaching to Roger Roulette, a renowned expert in the Ojibwe language.Children from more than eighty First Nations and other Indigenous communities attended Assiniboia.The first students came from First Nations in Manitoba.Slowly, students from Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario, and Quebec became part of the Assiniboia community.Those who survived genocide and violence while incarcerated in their first Indian residential schools became leaders in the evolution of the Indian residential schools system.Transition to life at Assiniboia brought us into a comfortable and safe urban environment.We are grateful to Reverend Father Omer Robidoux, Assiniboia's principal, whose grace and leadership brought us individually and collectively to a better place.This evolution is a testament to the adaptability of Indian children to survive colonization policies put into practice by governments, churches, and Indian residential school administrators.Yet approximately 60 to 70 percent of the former 600 students of Assiniboia departed this earth early.We miss them, and now, in our private moments, we relive the stories of the joy, love, and friendship we shared with those now departed from our realm.We remember all of our departed schoolmates, too numerous to list, but never forgotten.We remember the first graduates of Assiniboia, Oliver Nelson and Joe Guy Wood, and the many who followed through different eras, including wonderful singer and performer
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.240 | 0.163 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".