Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a prelude to the historical context of remembering the Assiniboia Indian Residential School, we must recall the events and reasons leading up to the establishment of an Indian residential school in a large metropolis like Winnipeg.This history reveals the impacts experienced by children, families, parents, and grandparents of both the colonizers and the colonized.It must be a continuing narrative for history's sake.This is not the beginning story nor an ending story, but a true depiction of a central part of a history now embedded in the collective library of knowledge of the survival of the First Peoples of Canada.Although much has been written about the history of Canada and the relationship of governments and settlers with the First Peoples of Canada, testimony of this true history as lived by the First Peoples of Canada has been brief.As former students, now adults, we are Survivors of the infamous Indian residential schools system.Our testimony, shared at our reunions, is shared here as remembrances and reclamation of our lived experiences.Yet the history of the Assiniboia Indian Residential School has been an enigma, a unique story left untold.Its existence and operation, from 1958 to 1973, were almost unknown to residents of the City of Winnipeg, including those living in River Heights, the neighbourhood where this Indian school was situated.What story was never told?Did you see us?The history of Assiniboia includes close to 1,000 individual stories, the lived experiences of former students, staff, parents, River Heights residents, and many others in the First Nations and non-Indigenous communities of Winnipeg and Manitoba.This book offers a small selection of these stories.More are left to be told.The Survivors of Assiniboia have deliberately included the word "Indian" in this book, to describe not only a school, but more
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.544 | 0.328 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".