Enantiospecific Cross-coupling of Cyclic Alkyl Sulfones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Methods to form carbon-carbon bonds efficiently and with control of stereochemistry are critical for the construction of complex molecules. Cross-coupling reactions are among the most efficient and widely used reactions to construct molecules, with reactions enabling the retention or installation of chirality as recent additions to this powerful toolbox. Sulfones are robust, accessible organic electrophiles that have many attractive features as cross-coupling partners, however since the first example of their use in 1979, there have been no examples of their use in enantio-selective, -specific or -convergent cross-couplings. The high acidity of sulfones makes it unclear whether this transformation is even possible outside tertiary systems. Herein we report the enantiospecific cross-coupling of cyclic sulfones and Grignard reagents. Up to 99% chirality transfer is observed despite the strong basicity of the Grignard components. In situ monitoring reveals that the cross-coupling is kinetically competitive with competing deprotonation, resulting in a highly enantioselective transformation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".