Analysis of Fares and Subsidy Needs for Public Transportation using The Vehicle Operating Cost Approach (Case Study: Corridor 2 Trans Cirebon)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Public transportation subsidies or what is called the Public Service Obligation (PSO) is an important indicator in the public transport system to ensure the sustainability of the operation of the public transportation system. Subsidies are government interventions in controlling transportation fares so that people can use public transportation at affordable fares. This study aims to provide an overview of the determination of fares and the amount of subsidy needed in corridor 2 of Trans Cirebon. Fare analysis is determined using the vehicle operating cost and Willingness To Pay (WTP) approaches which will then form the basis for providing an overview of the subsidy that should be provided by the Government in an ideal Trans Cirebon operation. This research shows that: 1) the fare currently applied are still in accordance with the WTP value the people of Cirebon City; 2) for an ideal Trans Cirebon operation, a vehicle operating cost of Rp. 6,135,159,933.29/year is required; 3) the amount of subsidy required ranges from Rp. 5,705,919,933.29/year to Rp. 6,108,879,933.29/year depending on the achievement value of the load factor and the fare applied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it