MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387585554 · doi:10.1016/j.hctj.2023.100022

Transition readiness measures for adolescents with chronic illness: A scoping review of new measures

2023· review· en· W4387585554 on OpenAlexafffund
Tieghan Killackey, Fareha Nishat, Ellen B. M. Elsman, Erica Lawson, Lauren Kelenc, Jennifer Stinson

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Care Transitions · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoYork University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHospital for Sick Children
KeywordsPsychologyClinical psychologyDevelopmental psychologyGerontologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The transition from pediatric to adult care settings for adolescents and young adults living with chronic conditions can be challenging and has been associated with declines in health and access to care. Well-validated measures of patients' transition readiness are critical, both for use in the clinical setting and to rigorously evaluate transition support programs for the purposes of research and health care quality improvement. Objectives: This review aimed to build off existing reviews and 1) identify and describe all newly developed and validated measures for the assessment of transition readiness for youth with chronic illness from the period of 2018-2022, and 2) evaluate their measurement properties and identify gaps in measurement testing. Methods: Electronic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsychINFO to identify articles developing and validating transition readiness in individuals aged 12-26 years with a chronic illness between 2018 and 2022. Two reviewers independently selected articles for review and assessed quality of measurement properties. Results: 22 studies met inclusion criteria reporting on 21 different tools. 9 studies reported on the development and evaluation of a new tool, and 13 reported on the adaptation, modification, and/or translation of an existing tool. Most adapted tools were translations and adaptations of the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ) (n = 7). While some of these studies demonstrated sufficient internal consistency and structural validity, few met the COSMIN criteria for reliability and hypothesis testing and none met the criteria for cross-cultural validity. Criterion validity and measurement error were not assessed in any studies. Conclusion: Many new transition readiness measures continue to be developed in recent years, yet few have undergone rigorous psychometric evaluation. The TRAQ was the existing measure most often used as a model for developing new or modified tools. There remains a clear need for further validation of existing measures of patients' readiness to transition as opposed to continuing to develop new measures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.212
GPT teacher head0.500
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth Care TransitionsSame topicAdolescent and Pediatric HealthcareFrench-language works237,207