MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparative analysis between microvascular decompression and non-surgical treatment for senile idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia

2018· article· en· W4387589628 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Leibo Wang, Qing-jun LIU, Jinhuan Wang, G J Zhai

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrovascular decompressionTrigeminal neuralgiaMedicineAnesthesiaSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of microvascular decompression (MVD) and non-surgical treatment for treating senile idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia (ITN). Methods A total of 133 patients older than 75 years with ITN respectively received MVD (N = 80) and non-surgical treatments (N = 53) such as pulse radiofrequency in 38 cases, stereotactic gamma knife radiotherapy in 10 cases, and acupuncture and moxibustion in 5 cases. McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) was used to evaluate the degree of pain improvement. World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale-100 (WHOQoL-100) was used to evaluate life quality. Postoperative complications were recorded, including facial blunt sensation, headache, nausea and vomiting, pneumonia, intracranial infection, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, deep venous thrombosis, incomplete facial paralysis, hearing loss and dyskinesia. Results In MVD group, 79 cases (98.75%) had complete pain relief and one case (1.25%) had partial pain relief after operation. There were 8 cases (15.09% ) with complete pain relief, 33 cases (62.26% ) with partial pain relief, and 12 cases (22.64% ) without pain relief in non-surgical treatment group. The difference between 2 groups was statistically significant (χ2 = 84.241, P = 0.000). After 55.80 (35.74, 63.48) months follow-up, the recurrence rate of MVD group was significantly lower than that of non-surgical treatment group [8.75% (7/80) vs. 35.85% (19/53); χ2= 16.558, P = 0.000]. The life quality of MVD group was better than that of non-surgical treatment group [WHOQoL-100 (27.82 ± 2.10) score vs. (22.19 ± 7.22) score; t = 1.202, P = 0.039]. The occurrence of postoperative complications such as facial blunt sensation, headache, nausea and vomiting were high in both groups, while the occurrence of pneumonia, intracranial infection, CSF leakage, deep venous thrombosis, incomplete facial paralysis, hearing loss and dyskinesia were rare in both groups. No case was dead. The incidence of facial blunt sensation in MVD group was significantly lower than that in non-surgical treatment group [8.75% (7/80) vs. 86.79% (46/53); χ2 = 81.005, P = 0.000]. Conclusions MVD is safe and effective in the treatment of senile ITN, so it is suggested that MVD should be the first choice for patients with ITN, unless they cannot tolerate general anesthesia. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2018.10.004

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.254
GPT teacher head0.574
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicTrigeminal Neuralgia and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207