Bibliographic record
Abstract
The more I read about Vilhjalmur Stefansson, the more I admire him, and the more I understand why he attracted such controversy.He was a brilliant anthropologist and an original thinker, and it is not surprising that he drove bureaucrats, including those in the Canadian geological survey, into fury.Waves of resistance often met his most creative ideas and plans.He was a man of great psychological complexity, but the story of his northern explorations-and his views on the reality of the lands and peoples he found there-fascinated his readers.In such books as The Friendly Arctic and Wrangel Island, which remain eminently readable, he infuriated his critics and delighted his admirers.His lengthy and extraordinary explanations drew a huge public, including Sir Robert Borden, the Canadian prime minister, who wrote an introduction to Stefansson's My Life with the Eskimo.He radically changed the image of the Arctic, especially in the minds of those who had never set foot there.He was an enemy of all who sought to fight the Arctic, to conquer it, to impose their will and their ideas on it.Stefansson was called "the prophet of the North", and, like many prophets, was sometimes without honour in his own country.But there was much truth in his observations.He said that the Arctic cold deprives no one of either health or comfort if he understands its conditions, takes the necessary precautions, and governs himself by common sense.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.767 | 0.767 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".