Poetics of Socio-Psychological Struggle of the Tragedies of W. Shakespeare and M. Auezov
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article considers the history of outstanding works of classical drama in the history of world word art in the framework of the poetics of tragedy in the plays of W. Shakespeare "Antony and Cleopatra", M. Auezov "Enlik-Kebek". In the story-compositional line of the plays the stable social nature of the tragic conflicts, the fundamental nature of the heroes, the text analysis of the individual tasks of the characters was carried out.In the plays, scientific conclusions are drawn about the contradictions between historical figures and members of their social environment in accordance with the laws of the philosophy of life. W. Shakespeare's tragedies" Antony and Cleopatra", M. Auezov's" Enlik-Kebek " are consistently focused on the reality of feelings of love with each other, the the nature of contradictions caused by incompatibility with the household environment, the views of representatives of different social environment, dialogues, monologues in plays, etc. It is consistent with the texts of the plays that the injustice is finally revealed through the monologues of the main characters, and that the virtues flourish with the character of universal humanism. In the research, scientific-theoretical and methodological substantiations of basic research devoted to the poetics of tragedy were harmoniously used.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.030 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".