A novel rare variants association test for binary traits in family-based designs via copulas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the cost-effectiveness technology in whole-genome sequencing, more sophisticated statistical methods for testing genetic association with both rare and common variants are being investigated to identify the genetic variation between individuals. Several methods which group variants, also called gene-based approaches, are developed. For instance, advanced extensions of the sequence kernel association test, which is a widely used variant-set test, have been proposed for unrelated samples and extended for family data. Family data have been shown to be powerful when analyzing rare variants. However, most of such methods capture familial relatedness using a random effect component within the generalized linear mixed model framework. Therefore, there is a need to develop unified and flexible methods to study the association between a set of genetic variants and a trait, especially for a binary outcome. Copulas are multivariate distribution functions with uniform margins on the [Formula: see text] interval and they provide suitable models to capture familial dependence structure. In this work, we propose a flexible family-based association test for both rare and common variants in the presence of binary traits. The method, termed novel rare variant association test (NRVAT), uses a marginal logistic model and a Gaussian Copula. The latter is employed to model the dependence between relatives. An analytic score-type test is derived. Through simulations, we show that our method can achieve greater power than existing approaches. The proposed model is applied to investigate the association between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in a family-based cohort consisting of 17 extended families from Eastern Quebec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.034 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".