Translation Purposes Determine Everything? Appellation Translation in Northern Shaanxi Folk Songs Based on Corpus Method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study employs the skopos theory to analyze the translation methods used for appellations in Northern Shaanxi folk songs, a prominent genre in Chinese folk songs. The skopos theory emphasizes the importance of understanding and respecting the purpose of a translation, as it ultimately shapes the translation process and outcome. The English translations by Wang Hongyin and Wang Zhanbin are used to create a bilingual Chinese-English parallel corpus using a corpus technique. Additionally, to help the corpus software retrieve important statistics, the appellations and translation methods are manually annotated with the pertinent software. This study identifies seven primary categories of appellations, including those related to love, characters, laborers, family, mythology, allusions, and Buddhist figures. It explores the translation methods applied to each category, revealing that Wang Hongyin and Wang Zhanbin creatively adapt these appellations to convey their essence and significance to English-speaking readers while adhering to the skopos theory’s principles. This article contributes valuable insights into the translation of Northern Shaanxi folk songs, transcending cultural boundaries and enhancing cross-cultural understanding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".