MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387614351 · doi:10.1016/j.cjcpc.2023.10.003

Congenital Tracheal Stenosis Patients Undergoing Modified Slide Tracheoplasty: Single-Centre Technique and Long-Term Morbidity and Mortality

2023· article· en· W4387614351 on OpenAlexaff
Ryaan EL‐Andari, Rami Zibdawi, Paula Holinski, John Koller, Chloë Joynt, Nee Scze Khoo, Laurance Lequier, Hamdy El‐Hakim, Mohammed Al Aklabi

Bibliographic record

VenueCJC Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTracheal and airway disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryConcomitantRetrospective cohort studySingle CenterTracheal StenosisBalloon dilationDuctus arteriosusBalloonAirway

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Congenital malformations of the trachea are rare but often life-threatening. Limited data have been published on the outcomes of tracheal reconstruction for congenital tracheal stenosis. We sought to describe the outcomes of patients undergoing tracheal reconstruction over 10 years at our centre. Methods: All paediatric patients who underwent long-segment tracheal or bronchial reconstruction from January 1, 2012, to August 31, 2022, were included. The primary outcome was mortality, and secondary outcomes included reoperation and postoperative morbidity. Patients were followed up to 10 years. Results: Thirty-three patients with ages ranging from 1 day to 12 years (mean 8.5 months) at the time of tracheoplasty or bronchoplasty were included, with 5 patients undergoing off-pump tracheal reconstruction. The most common preoperative comorbidities included patent ductus arteriosus (30.3%), atrial septal defect (27.3%), and prematurity (24.2%). There were no deaths postoperatively within the follow-up period. All patients experienced successful reconstruction with no patients requiring reoperation of the trachea. A total of 14 patients (42.4%) required postoperative balloon dilation, 3 (9.1%) required bronchial repair after tracheal repair, and 2 (6.1%) required bronchoscopic tracheal debridement. Conclusions: This single-centre retrospective study provides a large cohort of congenital tracheal reconstruction patients with a survival rate of 100%, experiencing no mortality during follow-up. The majority of patients had preoperative comorbidities and concomitant congenital cardiac defects. Although tracheal reconstruction continues to be complex with significant postoperative morbidity and mortality, the results of our single-centre study demonstrate the continual advancement of this field and the evolving improvement of postoperative outcomes for these patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCJC Pediatric and Congenital Heart DiseaseSame topicTracheal and airway disordersFrench-language works237,207