MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387620908 · doi:10.1161/res.133.suppl_1.ec.10

Abstract EC.10: Transcriptional Heterogeneity Of The Postnatal Cardiac Conduction System

2023· article· en· W4387620908 on OpenAlexaff
Yena Oh, Rimshah Abid, Saif Dababneh, David P. Cook, Jin G. Park, Barbara C. Vanderhyden, Nikhil Munshi, Kyoung-Han Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsOttawa Heart InstituteOttawa Public HealthUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBundle branchesBundleElectrical conduction system of the heartSinoatrial nodeAtrioventricular nodeBiologyImmunostainingTranscription factorAnatomyPurkinje fibersCell biologyInternal medicineMedicineNeuroscienceElectrophysiologyImmunohistochemistryGeneGeneticsEndocrinologyElectrocardiographyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cardiac conduction system (CCS) is a network of specialized cardiomyocytes responsible for the coordinated spreading of electrical impulses throughout the heart for synchronized contractions. The CCS is largely made up of the sinoatrial node (SAN), atrioventricular node (AVN) and the fast-conducting ventricular conduction system (VCS), which is further divided into the His bundle, Bundle branches and Purkinje fibers. Although these CCS structures were anatomically discovered >100 years ago, their molecular constituents are not fully known. In this study, CCS cells, making up ~0.05% of myocytes (~500 cells/heart), were isolated from early postnatal hearts (postnatal day 1 to 4) of fluorescent reporter mice (Cntn2-Cre;Rosa26TdTomato), purified using fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and subjected to single-cell RNA-sequencing. Unbiased cluster analysis on ~7000 CCS cells demonstrated distinct transcriptomic profiles in the SAN, AVN, proximal VCS ( His bundle, bundle branches) and distal VCS ( Purkinje fibers). Conforming to previous studies, global conduction markers, such as Cntn2 and Id2, were present throughout the entire CCS, while a VCS-specific transcription factor, Irx3 , was expressed only in the VCS. A comparison between proximal and distal VCS components revealed enrichments of Igfbp7 , Lyz2 and Sfrp5 in the proximal VCS, and Scn10a , Psd3 and Wisp1 in the distal VCS. Sub-clustering analysis followed by validation with immunostaining further identified unique molecular profiles of the SAN ( Shox2 , Vsnl1 ), AVN ( Rspo3 ), His bundle ( S100a6 , Pcp4 ) and bundle branches ( Nppa , Mest ). Data integrating publicly available ATAC-seq in SAN, AV junction, and atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes as well as Tbx3-ChIP-seq, suggested that these regional markers are possibly regulated by two CCS-specific transcription factors, Irx3 and Tbx3 . More importantly, overexpressing Irx3 and/or Tbx3 in cultured neonatal mouse atrial and ventricular myocytes recapitulated these region-specific expression patterns in a dish. Together, our study provides a comprehensive view of the molecular profiles within the postnatal CCS at a high-resolution and show Irx3 and Tbx3 as genetic regulators establishing heterogeneities of the CCS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation ResearchSame topicCongenital heart defects researchFrench-language works237,207