MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387621058 · doi:10.1161/res.133.suppl_1.p3037

Abstract P3037: MicroRNA-205 Is Required For Normal Cell Cycle And Cardiac Growth In The Neonatal Mouse Heart.

2023· article· en· W4387621058 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick G. Burgon, Jonathon Weldrick, Rui Yi, Lynn A. Megeney

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsOttawa Public HealthUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsmicroRNABiologyCytokinesisHeart developmentDicerCell cycleIn situ hybridizationAndrologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyCardiac function curveMuscle hypertrophyFetusEmbryonic stem cellMessenger RNACell divisionCellHeart failureMedicineGeneticsRNAPregnancyGeneSmall interfering RNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After birth, most newborn mouse cardiomyocytes (CM) undergo a final cycle of cell division in the absence of cytokinesis, which leads to binucleation. The majority of subsequent increases in cardiac mass are attributable to cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, as a negligible number of new CM are created after birth. Mice with a heart-specific deletion of Dicer, a crucial enzyme necessary for microRNA maturation, die by the fifth postnatal day in spite of having normal cardiac morphology and function at birth. Despite the significance of this phenomenon, little is known about the molecular/genetic foundation for the change from hyperplastic to hypertrophic-based myocardial expansion that occurs in the neonatal mouse heart. We hypothesize that a microRNA is required for the normal transition from fetal to adult heart during the neonatal period. Heart microRNA profiles (3 arrays/time point) were measured from RNA was isolated from E19, 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 35-day-old mouse hearts (9 hearts/time point pooled). Bioinformatic analysis identified microRNA-205 as a possible participant in the cardiac transitional program. We observed a transient 20-fold increase in miR205 expression between postnatal days 1 and 5, with levels returning to baseline by day 10. In-situ hybridization revealed miR-205 expression is restricted to the heart's epicardium.We next generated mice with a CM-specific deletion of miR205 using MHCcre targeting of a floxed-miR205 allele. Mice lacking miR-205 in their CM appear normal at birth. Elevated cell cycle markers (Ki67 & phospho-pH3) were detected at postnatal day-14 with 20% larger hearts at postnatal day 14, and adult hearts measuring up to 50% larger than controls. In contrast, a CM-specific miR205 over-expression mouse model resulted in more CM being present at both 5-day and 14-day post-birth. Interestingly, no difference in cell-cycle markers or heart size was observed. miR205 directly targets YAP within the evolutionarily conserved hippo pathway, which regulates organ size. YAP protein expression is significantly increased in hearts lacking miR205. Both of the miR205-heart models present with altered Hippo signaling kinetics after birth. We conclude that miR205 regulates postnatal heart size by directly modulating the Hippo pathway.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation ResearchSame topicMicroRNA in disease regulationFrench-language works237,207