Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article will discuss some of the most prominent definitions of the critical concept known generally under the term Magic Realism. It is also known as “Magical Realism” (Pietri 161, Flores 112), “the Marvelous Real” (Carpentier 75), “the Supernatural Real” (Guenther 33), “New Objectivity” (Hartlub 3, Guenther 33) and “The Fantastic Real” (Chanady 6), among other titles primarily associated with postcolonial literature. It will attempt to arrive at a clear and comprehensive understanding of the literary concepts and practices denoted by this term. It will then attempt to redefine that concept in the light of its discussion of one of Suhair ElMusadafa’s latest works, The Forbidden Garden- الحديقة المحرمة (2018), translated into English by the author and republished in Canada in 2022. It will argue that this novel’s narrative structure, characterization, and general symbolic and allegoric approaches offer an enlargement of some of the most significant ideals of Magic Realism as defined hereafter. This is particularly the case with regards to this novel’s event sequencing processes, characterization philosophy, and cultural ideals and practices including its concept of the nature of both reality and fantasy. This novel’s unique formal philosophy, identity politics, ironic stance and multi-layered allegorism offer particular cultural and aesthetic challenges and ideals that negotiate the fabric of readers’ understanding of life, self and morality. Key words: Magic Realism , Suhair Elhusadafa, The Forbidden Garden, Postcolonial Narrative. The Marvelous Real.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".