Urban Solid Residues Management: An Analysis from Sobral-CE/Brazil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Integrated Solid Residues Management can be understood as a way of designing, implementing and managing urban solid residues management systems, considering a broad participation of sectors of society and having sustainable development as a perspective. However, the excessive consumption of post-modern society has contributed to the increase in residues generation, especially in urban centers and, allied to this, the precarious Brazilian scenario regarding the management and logistics of disposal and treatment of residues, ending up trigger great harm in the environmental and socio-economic context. The main objective of this research was to analyze the current context regarding the management of urban solid residues in the city of Sobral-Ce, considering from the adequacy to PNRS, socio-environmental impacts associated with in appropriate residue disposal, as well as measures implemented by the city hall in mitigation of such impacts. The methodology used was descriptive and exploratory research. The results indicate that, despite the existence of public policies (in the initial phase) aimed at the correct disposal of solid residues in the city of Sobral, it was possible to verify during the field research that, in almost all neighborhoods of the city, there is inadequate accumulation of residues. Therefore, it is necessary, even if in the implementation phase, the elaboration of the integrated plans is really effective, as well as measures implemented by the city hall in the mitigation of such impacts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".