MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Acute Bronchiolitis: The Less, the Better?

2023· article· en· W4387654963 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fabrizio Virgili, Raffaella Nenna, Greta Di Mattia, Luigi Matera, Laura Petrarca, Maria Giulia Conti, Fabio Midulla

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Pediatric Reviews · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBronchiolitisAcute BronchiolitisInternal medicineRespiratory system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Acute bronchiolitis is a viral infection of the lower respiratory tract affecting infants aged under 12 months, variably presenting with respiratory distress, diffuse crackles and inflammatory wheezing. The main causative agent is Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV). The diagnosis is clinical and treatment mainly supportive. Despite the availability of more than 30 international guidelines, consistent management recommendations are lacking and considerable variability in patients' care persists among different providers. OBJECTIVE: To review and describe current knowledge about epidemiology, physiopathology, clinic, diagnosis and management of acute bronchiolitis, with particular emphasis on updated evidence and future perspectives in terms of treatment and prevention. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched Cochrane for systematic reviews and PubMed for scientific articles published in the last 10 years, using a combination of the following search terms: "bronchiolitis", "respiratory syncytial virus", "epidemiology", "risk factors", "severity", "diagnosis", "clinic", "diagnostic imaging", "management", "asthma", "wheezing", "bronchodilator", "steroids", "hypertonic saline", "oxygen", "blood gas analysis", "HHHFNC", "rehydration", "enteral feeding", "parenteral hydration", "prevention", "vaccine" and "COVID-19 or SARS-CoV2". We accordingly performed a deep and extensive selection of the most updated and considerable literature on the matter, summarizing the most significant evidence concerning all aspects of acute bronchiolitis (epidemiology, clinic, diagnosis, management and prevention). Furthermore, we examined references and available guidelines from UK, USA, Canada, Italy and Spain. Results are extensively discussed below. CONCLUSION: Although acute bronchiolitis has been a widely known disease for decades, its therapeutic approach remained unchanged and essentially limited to respiratory and metabolic support. Despite the abundance of studies, there is no significant evidence concerning therapeutic alternatives (e.g. steroids, inhaled hypertonic solution), which are therefore not recommended. According to most recent data, "acute bronchiolitis" definition encompasses a plethora of different clinical entities related to each subject's genetic and immune predisposition. Therefore, future research should focus on the precise characterization of such subcategories in order to individualize therapeutic management and ensure the most appropriate evidence-based care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0080.010
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.163
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Pediatric ReviewsSame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207